Thailand’s Office of the Attorney-General (OAG) is advancing a proposal that could allow authorities to confiscate vehicles from drivers caught under the influence, aiming to curb the country’s persistent road safety challenges. The measure, announced in June 2025, is part of an effort to deter repeat offenses and enhance public safety through tougher legal consequences.
Under the proposed guidelines, those found driving over the legal alcohol limit could face asset forfeiture, with the vehicle used in the offense subject to seizure. Legal scholar Pokpong Srisanit, dean of the Faculty of Law at Thammasat University, supports the measure, stating that such behavior reflects a clear intention to violate the law and endanger public safety.
The proposal allows for some leniency in specific circumstances. Vehicle owners unaware that their cars were being used by intoxicated drivers may have an opportunity to reclaim their property. However, knowingly allowing an impaired individual to use a vehicle could result in permanent forfeiture.
To ensure the policy is applied fairly and effectively, the proposal emphasizes the importance of consistency and transparency in enforcement. Pokpong cautioned that without consistent application, such measures could be undermined by corruption or selective implementation. He suggested equipping all police checkpoints with recording equipment to support impartial enforcement.
The initiative draws from legal frameworks in countries such as France, where vehicle seizure is typically reserved for repeated violations or cases resulting in severe harm. Similarly, Thailand’s version is expected to focus on serious or repeat offenses.
In line with the proposal, Deputy Government Spokesman Karom Phonpornklang called for the application of Section 43 of the Land Traffic Act, which pertains to reckless driving, to strengthen legal responses against offenders.
The initiative is part of broader judicial efforts to reduce traffic-related fatalities. Although the proposal has drawn attention for its tough stance, its success will depend largely on how consistently it is enforced across jurisdictions.
Officials backing the plan include legal experts and government representatives, with discussions continuing in legal and public safety forums. The measure reflects a broader governmental push to introduce more impactful deterrents amid growing concern over traffic-related incidents.
